|
NSJ Bioreagents
gfap antibody / glial fibrillary acidic protein Gfap Antibody / Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, supplied by NSJ Bioreagents, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/gfap antibody / glial fibrillary acidic protein/product/NSJ Bioreagents Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gfap antibody / glial fibrillary acidic protein - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
91/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
gfap ![]() Gfap, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/gfap/product/Novus Biologicals Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gfap - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Santa Cruz Biotechnology
antibodies against gfap ![]() Antibodies Against Gfap, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against gfap/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against gfap - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
anti gfap ![]() Anti Gfap, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti gfap/product/Novus Biologicals Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti gfap - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
pbs ![]() Pbs, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/pbs/product/Novus Biologicals Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pbs - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
glial fibrillary acidic protein gfap ![]() Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Gfap, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/glial fibrillary acidic protein gfap/product/Novus Biologicals Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
glial fibrillary acidic protein gfap - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
ihc staining ![]() Ihc Staining, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/ihc staining/product/Novus Biologicals Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ihc staining - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Aging and Disease
Article Title: Stroke Exacerbates Respiratory Disorder and Cognition Impairment in Mice with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
doi: 10.14336/AD.2025.0474
Figure Lengend Snippet: Stroke increases astrocytic gliosis and induced astrocytic polarization in RTN. (A) RTN chemo-sensitive phox2B-positive neurons (area circumscribed by red solid line) are located ventromedial to the VII, medial to the pyramidal tract. (B) Histological representation of the RTN location within the brainstem, illustrating the specific area analyzed in both WT, CAA, and stroke mice, in relation to the 7th Facial Nucleus (7 N), Scale bar = 300μm/50 μm (zoom). (C-G) Images show the GFAP expression in each group(F (2,18) =19.043, P <0.001), and dual-IF staining for GFAP with C3 (F (2,18) =19.851, P <0.001 ), GFAP with S100A10 (F (2,18) =21.306, P <0.001) in RTN from WT, CAA, and stroke mice at day 42 post-ischemia (n= 5 for WT group, n=7 for CAA-Sham group and n=9 for CAA-pd-MCAO group). Scale bar = 50 µm. * P <0.05; ** P <0.01; *** P <0.001. ns: non-significance. The data are shown as the mean ± SEM. After performing the Shapiro-Wilk normality test to examine the normal distribution, One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to analyze the data pertaining to multiple groups, subsequently, multiple comparisons were conducted using the uncorrected Fisher's LSD test.
Article Snippet: Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against Aβ (1:300, Abcam, Cat# ab201060), Phox2B (1:20, Bio-Techne, Cat# AF4940),
Techniques: Expressing, Staining
Journal: Frontiers in Pharmacology
Article Title: Neuroprotective effects of rutin, sodium selenite, and rutin-conjugated selenium nanoparticles in a social isolation model
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2026.1782734
Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of treatments on neuronal and glial function biomarkers in the prefrontal cortex. (A) BDNF mRNA fold change and (B) GFAP mRNA fold change. Data are represented as mean ± SEM ( n = 7). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. # = vs. Control; $ = vs. SI; @ = vs. SI&RUT-SeNPs; * = vs. SI&OLA; P < 0.05.
Article Snippet: To evaluate astrocytic activation and neuronal survival, paraffin embedded cortical sections were subjected to IHC staining targeting
Techniques: Control
Journal: Frontiers in Pharmacology
Article Title: Neuroprotective effects of rutin, sodium selenite, and rutin-conjugated selenium nanoparticles in a social isolation model
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2026.1782734
Figure Lengend Snippet: RUT-SeNPs protect against GFAP staining in the prefrontal cortex of rats with SI. Photomicrographs of the prefrontal cortex from each group. GFAP immunoreactivity was detected in tissues using DAB chromogen, resulting in a brown color (arrow) (DAB, X400, Scale bar = 50 µm). The control group (A) had normal cortical anatomy and mild GFAP staining. The SI (B) and SI&Na2SeO3-treated (E) groups showed strong GFAP immunostaining. In contrast, the (C) SI&OLA, (D) SI&RUT, and (F) SI&RUT-SeNP-treated groups demonstrated decreased GFAP staining. (G) Quantitative analysis of immunostaining area % for GFAP was expressed as mean ± S.E.M ( n = 7). Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. # = vs. Control; $ = vs. SI; @ = vs. SI&RUT-SeNPs; * = vs. SI&OLA; P < 0.05.
Article Snippet: To evaluate astrocytic activation and neuronal survival, paraffin embedded cortical sections were subjected to IHC staining targeting
Techniques: Staining, Control, Immunostaining